Claude Code
~/.claude
Codex is my current primary production environment inside a provider-aware operating system. Claude Code and OpenCode remain compatible runtimes, while shared instruction contracts, skills, state, phase gates, and feedback loops keep the engineering method portable. The linker parses locally in your browser; nothing leaves the tab.
( Runtimes )
~/.claude
A compatible runtime used selectively for implementation, review, and existing workflow support.
~/.codex
The current primary production environment for planning, implementation, orchestration, and verification.
~/.config/opencode
The lightweight third runtime — quick tasks on a lean plan, same harness underneath.
( Architecture )
( System Linker )
Three link cards, one parser pipeline. Point the linker at ~/.claude, ~/.codex, or ~/.config/opencode and it renders a system report of your installation — agents, skills, commands, hooks, MCP servers, settings highlights, session counts. Or load the demo: a sanitized snapshot of my rig, run through the exact same parsers.
Your linked files are read and parsed entirely in this browser tab. Their contents are never sent anywhere — no upload, and no analytics event includes a file name, path, or anything derived from them. Credential files are never opened.
~/.claude
~/.codex
~/.config/opencode
( known limitations )
( Feedback )
Whichever runtime executes, the work runs one closed loop: explicit phase gates, model-tier routing, persistent handoffs, independent review, and evidence-backed completion.
A sprint contract before any non-trivial change: goal, scope, non-goals, acceptance criteria, verification plan, and an intentionally selected orchestration mode.
Single-threaded writes — one scoped builder executes against the contract, with reads fanned out to parallel subagents when discovery demands it.
A runnable check in the same pass: lint, typecheck, build, e2e. Evidence is captured, not asserted — 'looks done' is not a signal.
A fresh-context reviewer — ideally a different model lineage — scores the work 1–10 against the rubric and issues a verdict.
Compact written state so the next session resumes from documents, not memory: what happened, what's in flight, what to do next.
( hard limits )
| Limit | Value |
|---|---|
| Max subagents | 3 |
| Max team size (incl. lead) | 4 |
| Max workflow workers | 8 |
| Max feedback iterations | 6 |
( verdicts )
PASS requires exactly 10/10 — zero critical or major issues, verification evidence present; in an autonomous loop there is no partial pass. REVISE sends the work back through the loop with findings attached; BLOCK stops it for human review.